More Q&A's Regarding HB 1195

Yeline Goin, Esq.We continue to receive questions regarding HB 1195, the comprehensive community association bill that passed during the 2011 Legislative Session and became effective on July 1, 2011.  Therefore, I wanted to take an opportunity to answer some of the questions. 

QUESTION:  It appears to me that there is a conflict between a provision that was amended by HB 1195 and an existing Florida Statute. Specifically, HB 1195 amended Section 720.303(2)(b) regarding members’ rights to speak at board meetings. Doesn’t this conflict with Section 720.306, also dealing with the right of members to speak at meetings?

ANSWER:  The provision that was amended by HB 1195 is Section 720.303(2)(b), Florida Statutes, which deals with board of directors meetings.  Specifically, HB 1195 deleted the requirement that members must petition the board in order to speak at board meetings.  It further provided members with the right to speak at board meetings with reference to all designated items.  As you noted in your question, Section 720.306(6), Florida Statutes was not amended.  That section of the statute deals with owners’ meetings (for example, annual meetings of the owners and special meetings of the owners).  In order to speak at an owners’ meeting, an owner must submit a written request to speak prior to the meeting.  It does not require a “petition” like the old version of Section 720.303(2)(b).  Therefore, I do not believe there is a direct conflict between the two sections, although the procedures are a bit different if you want to speak at a board meeting versus at an owner’s meeting.

QUESTION:  Can a condominium association suspend the right to use common elements and/or suspend voting rights, if an owner is not paying his assessments to the condominium association, but is paying assessments to the master association? 

Old & New Capitol Building, Tallahassee, FL (c) Peter J. NolanANSWER:   If an owner is paying the master association assessments, but not the condominium association assessments, the condominium association can suspend the right of an owner to use the common elements of the condominium association, but cannot suspend the owner’s right to use the common areas of the master association. For example, if the pool is on master association common area property, the condominium association cannot suspend the owner’s right to use the common area pool. However, if the pool is located on the common elements of the condominium association, then the condominium association can suspend the owner’s right to use the pool. Likewise, the condominium association can suspend the owner’s voting rights, but such suspension would apply to meetings of the condominium association, not to meetings of the master association. Note that the suspension of use rights and voting rights only applies if an owner is more than ninety days delinquent in the payment of a monetary obligation due to the association. The association must impose the suspensions at a duly noticed board meeting and after provide written notice of such suspensions to the unit owner, and if applicable, the unit owner’s occupant, licensee, or invitee by mail or hand delivery.

QUESTION:  Can we send a letter to the owners telling them that if they do not want their phone numbers listed in the directory, they must let us know? Also, is a “members’ list” on the association’s website the same as a published directory?

ANSWER:   Regarding your first question, the answer is no. You cannot take the lack of response by an owner as an approval to include that owner’s contact information in a directory. In other words, you must obtain something in writing from the owners stating that they are consenting to their contact information being included in a directory. You cannot assume that they have consented based on their failure to respond to an association request. 

Regarding your second question, there is no prohibition in listing members’ names on a website.  The statutes do not prohibit the listing of names. Rather, it prohibits the disclosure of personal identifying information (i.e., telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, e-mail addresses, other mailing addresses, etc.). Therefore, a list of the members without any contact information included is permissible.

Legislative Webinar Q&A Round-Up

David Muller, Esq.
David Muller

The Community Association Leadership Lobby (“CALL”), the lobby arm of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., recently hosted a Legislative Webinar that focused on recent changes to Florida Law based on the 2011 Legislative Session.  We were honored to have State Representative George Moraitis, who sponsored HB 1195 (this year’s large community association bill), join us as a guest presenter during the Webinar.  We had a record number of attendees for the Webinar and we thank you for your continued support and interest.

The webinar can be viewed by clicking here.

We received several questions during the Webinar, including the following:

Question:  Are we allowed to send an e-mail to all owners?  Should the e-mail addresses be all entered as blind copy?

Answer:  Your question refers to the provisions contained in Section 718.111(12), Florida Statutes (condominium associations), and Section 720.303(5)(c), Florida Statutes (homeowners associations), which prohibit disclosing certain information, such as owner e-mail addresses, to other owners.  HB 1195, which will become effective on July 1, 2011, will allow for the release of certain “personal identifying information” if the subject owner consents in writing to the disclosure of this protected information.  Thus, the sending of mass e-mails to the owners is not specifically prohibited by this statute.  That said, unless you blind copy all of the owners (i.e. send the e-mail via the “bcc” feature), all of the owners will have the opportunity to view their neighbors e-mail addresses.  Unless the written consents of all of the owners have been obtained (per the new law), this could be viewed as a violation of the above-referenced statutes.  Therefore, the conservative approach would be to only send mass e-mails to the owners by using the blind copy feature.  

Question:  Can we send a letter to the owners saying that their personal identifying information (e.g. e-mail address, etc.) will be made available unless they specifically tell us not to disclose this information?

Answer:  The new statute cited above calls for an “opt-out” not an “opt-in” on this issue.  In other words, you must obtain the written consent of the owners to disclose this information.  The statute does not allow an association to proceed as you suggest above.  

Question:  Where can I find the new form “tenant collection letter” contemplated under Section 718.116(11), Florida Statutes (condominium associations), Section 719.108(10), Florida Statutes (cooperatives), and Section 720.3085(8), Florida Statutes (homeowners associations)?  Is this form available online?

Answer:  The new form letter you reference above is specifically included in the language of the above-referenced statutes, which will go into effect on July 1, 2011.  The form for condominium associations can be viewed by clicking here (which takes you to the text of HB 1195), beginning on page 30.

The form letter for cooperatives can be viewed on page 54 of this same link.  The form letter for homeowners associations can be viewed on page 71 of this same link.  Associations should consult with their attorneys regarding the new collection laws so as to ensure proper compliance.  

CALL has also prepared a comprehensive summary of the 2011 Legislative Session, which can be accessed by clicking here.


 

CALL ALERT For May 9, 2011 - 2011 Legislative Session Wrap-Up

CALLThe Florida Legislature adjourned Sine Die at 3:35 a.m. on Saturday morning, May 7, bringing the 2011 Legislative Session to a close. As we announced previously, the main community association bill, HB 1195 (companion bill SB 530) passed and is headed to the Governor. CALL worked closely with the sponsors of that piece of legislation to ensure the best possible result for community associations.

CALL also worked hard to prevent some very bad legislation from passing including: (1) the language in the deregulation bill that would have eliminated state regulation of community association managers and the Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes; and (2) the “design professionals” bill that would have protected design professionals (e.g. architects and engineers) that fail to properly carry out their professional duties. Overall, the 2011 Legislative Session was a good one for community association legislation.

The following is a summary of the bills impacting community associations that passed and did not pass.

BILLS THAT PASSED

HB 1195, by Rep. Moraitis Community Associations
The companion bill in the Senate was SB 530 by Senator Fasano. This is a summary of the issues CALL worked on and drafted language for which are contained within this bill.

  • Official Records (Condominiums and HOAs)
    • Will clarify that owners are permitted to consent in writing to the disclosure of their protected contact information.

    • Will clarify that although personnel records are not available for inspection by owners, the owners will be permitted to inspect employment agreements and budgetary and financial records that indicate the compensation paid to employees.

  • Open Meetings (Condominiums)

Will permit condominium boards the right to hold closed meetings (not open to unit owner observation) for “personnel” matters. Legal counsel need not be present. (This is already the law in the homeowners’ association context.)

  • Attachment of Rents (Condominiums, Cooperatives and HOAs)

Will clarify that “future monetary obligations” includes all rent due from the tenant to the unit or parcel owner and must be paid to the association until all delinquent accounts are paid in full.

  • Director Certification (Condominiums)
    • Will provide that condominium association directors may submit proof of educational course attendance (in lieu of signing the certification form) and such course must have been completed within 1 year before or 90 days after the date of the election or appointment. 

    • The written certification is valid as long as the director serves on the board without interruption.

    • Suspensions (Condominiums, Cooperatives, HOAs)

    • Will allow suspension of common element use rights for non-payment (no hearing is required) and for bad acts (hearing is required).

    • Will clarify that if voting rights are suspended, the suspended vote will not count towards quorum or vote required to approve an action.

    • Suspensions for non-payment will not require hearing, but will require board approval at properly noticed meeting.

HB 59, by Rep. Julien, Service of Process

Will allow process servers to have unannounced entry to the community, including the common areas and common elements, of condominiums, gated communities, or cooperatives to serve process on a defendant or witness who resides or is known to be within community.

SB 650, by Sen. Jones, Home Parks

  • Will allow local governments to enforce violations of ss. 723.022 and 723.023, which contain the numerous legal obligations of mobile home park owners.
  • Penalties against the mobile home owner shall not be levied for any duty or responsibility of the mobile home park owner under s. 723.022 or against a mobile home park owner for any duty or responsibility of the mobile home owner under s. 723.023.
  • Will require certain notices to be provided to mobile home owners before the park owner can evict the mobile home owner because of a change in land use.

SB 408, by Sen. Richter, Property and Casualty Insurance

  • Sinkhole coverage will be limited to structural damage for primary buildings.
  • Will strictly define “structural damage” to minimize frivolous claims.
  • Will reduce the window for filing hurricane and windstorm claims from five to three years after a storm.
  • Will reduce the window for filing sinkhole claims from five years to three years.
  • Will allow insurers to withhold full payment for a claim until policyholders sign a contract for repairs, and the repairs are made, except for homes that are destroyed.
  • Will allow insurers to raise premiums by up to 15% per year for reinsurance costs.

HB 883, by Rep. Horner, Public Lodging Establishments

  • Will replace the terms “resort condominiums” and “resort dwellings” with the term “vacation rental”.
  • The term “vacation rental” will be defined as a unit or group of units in a condominium, cooperative, or timeshare plan or any individually or collectively owned single-family, two-family, or four-family house or dwelling unit that is also a transient public lodging establishment.

HB 849, by Rep. Davis Public Swimming Pools; Elevators

  • Will adopt the pool retrofitting requirements in the federal Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act by requiring public swimming pool and spa drain covers and grates to be equipped with an anti-entrapment system or device.
  • Will provide that if a public pool or spa constructed before June 1, 1993, has one main drain, the owner or operator of the pool must retrofit by choosing one of the following:

    • A safety vacuum release system;
    • A suction-limiting vent system;
    • A gravity drainage system with collector tank;
    • An automatic pump system; or
    • A device that disables the drain.
       
  • The above referenced retrofitting methods are consistent with the federal law and expands state law to allow gravity drainage with collector tank as an acceptable retrofitting method.
  • Will eliminate the requirement that multi-family dwellings, including condominiums, that are at least 75 feet high and contain a public elevator, have at least one elevator that can be powered by an alternate power source (for example, a generator). 
  • Will eliminate the requirement that the operators of such buildings adopt an emergency operations plan.
  • We will notify you when Governor Scott takes action on these bills. If you wish to contact Governor Scott regarding any of these bills, his contact information is listed below:

Governor Rick Scott
Phone :(850) 488-7146 Fax: (850) 487-0801
Email: rick.scott@eog.myflorida.com

BILLS THAT DID NOT PASS

SB 332/HB 173 - Sumberged Land Leases
Would have treated multi-family residences (including condominium associations) the same as single family residences with respect to the regulation of submerged land leases. Currently, multi-family residences are subject to the same regulation and fees as commercial, profit-making entities. This bill would have exempted multi-family residences from such regulations.

SB 646 - Mobile Home Parks
Would have required a mobile home park owner to notify the officers of the homeowners’ association created by ss. 723.075-723.079 of a bona fide offer for purchase.

SB 712 - Suspension of Cable and Internet
Would have specifically allowed cable and internet services to be suspended by a condominium association if the owner is delinquent in the payment of assessment.

SB 832/HB 583 - Mobile Home Parks

Would have required that the Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes notify the homeowners’ association prior to approving any proposed amendments to the prospectus or offering circle.

Would have required a mobile home park owner to provide a prospective lessee with a “mobile home expense disclosure document.”

Would have defined the “market area or competitive area” for comparable mobile home parks to mean the county in which the mobile home park is located along with any contiguous counties.

SB 1112 - Rental Data to Property Appraiser
Would have required condominium and cooperative associations to annually provide the property appraiser with a list of units rented during the previous year, for the purpose of such would be to identify those units that are improperly receiving a homestead exemption. 

SB 1132 - Cooperative Associations
Would have prohibited immediate family members residing in the same unit from serving concurrently on the board of a cooperative association.

SB1288/HB 799 - Non-judicial Foreclosure of Commercial Property
Would have required non-judicial foreclosure for commercial real property, including commercial condominiums. 

SB 1516 - Condominium and Homeowners’ Associations
Some of the provisions in this bill passed in HB 1195. Some of the provisions that did not pass include:

Would have required insurance companies to notify all unit owners by certified and regular mail if an association having 50 or fewer units cancels or does not renew its required insurance coverage, and would have allowed a majority of the voting interests to agree in writing to direct the board to obtain substitute coverage.

Would have required “condo-style” elections for homeowners’ associations including a 60-day first notice, self-nominations 40 days in advance of the annual meeting, second notice, two-envelopes, secret ballots, etc.

Would have prohibited co-owners of a parcel in a homeowners’ association from serving as members of the board at the same time unless they own more than one parcel or unless there are not enough eligible candidates to fill the vacancies on the board.

Thank you to all of our CALL members who sent e-mails, wrote letters, made phone calls, etc. during this Legislative Session to ensure that positive community association was adopted and that onerous legislation was defeated. We could not accomplish our objectives and goals without your help. We also would like to thank the members of the Legislature that worked with CALL on positive community association legislation.

Very truly yours,

Yeline Goin and David Muller, Co-Executive Directors

Community Association Leadership Lobby (CALL) 

 

Legislative Update - Community Association Bills heard by House Civil Justice and Courts Policy Committee

A couple of CA bills of interest were heard by the House Civil Justice & Courts Policy Committee on Tuesday (February 4, 2010) morning. HB 329 by Rep. Robaina was debated and it was decided by the Committee to hold off on taking a vote due to some concerns with the provisions pertaining to the ability of associations to go after payment of assessments from renters when unit owner landlords aren’t paying.

HB 561, a omnibus CA bill which CALL is working on very closely with sponsors Bogdanoff and Hudson, was passed by the committee after adopting several amendments pertaining to the contentious sprinkler retrofit issue. It would move the date of compliance to 2019 from 2014 and say that if an association has voted to forego retrofitting that 10 percent of owners could petition to have a special meeting “re-vote” once every 3 years. CALL will continue to monitor this issue to make certain a workable solution is found which doesn’t jeopardize the bill.

There was also a discussion on the Florida Supreme Court’s administrative order re the mandatory mediation process for residential mortgage foreclosure cases. David Muller of CALL was asked by the Committee to testify and was able to provide helpful information on the foreclosure crisis many associations are facing and how this mediation process must not cause further delay and cost. This issue remains a top priority of CALL. We need you to let your Legislators know how your association is being impacted and ask for action.