Court Rules HOA Cannot Turn Off Water

Lisa A. Magill, Florida Lawyer, Real Estate Attorney In a previous post I addressed whether an association could cut off cable or shut down water.

 An association in Hillsborough County amended its documents to ostensibly allow it to take these actions if any of the homeowners failed to pay assessments.  Remember, HOA's have the authority to suspend use of common areas and facilities if the governing documents contain appropriate language. 

The Court found that the association went to far and on Wednesday, September 16, 2009, it Ordered the association to restore water service to the townhome of the delinquent owner. 

A Fox News video relating to this story shows conditions associated with the property. 

Many communities are struggling to make ends meet.  If water/sewer is paid for as a common expense because there is only one meter, it may be advisable to investigate whether sub-metering is an option.  Of course, there are legal issues that need to be addressed and therefore please consult with your community association attorney before making any changes to the property or utility services.

 

Q&A: Condo Insurance Requirements

Readers have submitted quite a few questions in the last few weeks regarding insurance for condominium property and responsibility for repair of damages.  Section 718.111(11), Florida Statutes, requires every condominium association to maintain insurance coverage for:

  • All portions of the condominium property as originally constructed (including replacements of like kind); and
  • All alterations or additions to the common elements or association property made in compliance with Section 718.113(2), Florida Statutes, but excludes:
  • Floor, wall or ceiling coverings, electrical fixtures, water heaters, water filters, cabinets, countertops, appliances, window treatments and personal property within the units.

Every unit owner is required to carry coverage for their unit and any improvements or modifications made to their unit (or limited common elements).  Unit Owner coverage must:

  • Be excess to the association's coverage;
  • Contain at least $2,000 of loss assessment coverage; and
  • Name the association as an additional insured and loss payee on the casualty portion of the policy.

 As for specific questions by readers:

 What is the new law concerning condo air-conditioners? Is there a new law?

The association's insurance policy must include coverage for the HVAC system - the air conditioning units, compressors, thermostats, duct work, etc., when in the past air conditioners serving the unit were insured by the individual unit owner.  Community leaders and managers make sure these items are included in the current appraisal so there is enough coverage in the event of a loss.

I have heard from someone that this LAW (just the other day) has been overturned ..can you verify this?

 

The Florida legislature passed a bill that would have eliminated the Unit Owner coverage mandate, but that bill was vetoed by the Governor.  Consequently, every Unit Owner is required to purchase insurance coverage and provide evidence of the coverage to the association when asked.  If the Unit Owner fails to comply, the association actually has the option of buying coverage for the unit and charging the owner for the expense.   The charges can be included in a lien against the unit and the association can foreclose if the owner still refuses to reimburse it for the insurance expense.

For more information regarding the vetoed bill, please refer to an earlier post by clicking HERE.

What happens when there are damages from a roof leak, a burst pipe, a toilet that overflows?  More reader questions regarding damages later this week....

  

Tags: ,

Q&A: Condominium and Homeowners Association Bankruptcy

The Maison Grande and other bankruptcy filings by community associations have spurred interest in reorganization of debt.  Is bankruptcy an option for your cash strapped community?  What issues do you need to consider?   Bankruptcy Attorney Aleida Martinez Molina answers the following questions for community associations struggling with bills and bad debt.

CAN CONDOMINIUM OR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY?  Yes. Under certain circumstances, condominium associations have successfully reorganized under Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. sections 101, et seq. (“Chapter 11” and “the Code,” respectively). This phenomenon is not unique to Florida – there have been successful condominium association reorganizations throughout the United States.

WHAT IS A BANKRUPTCY IN THE CONTEXT OF A COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION? The first point to understand is that Chapter 11 is a reorganization process – not liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Code. As such, it can provide associations the protections of the automatic stay and other relevant Code provisions while allowing them to formulate a plan of reorganization to extricate themselves from the particular financial situation.

UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO REORGANIZE? The Code has unique provisions which in essence give associations a more level playing field to negotiate with creditors. A number of associations find themselves with daunting contracts or leases which they might renegotiate or simply reject if able to do so. A reorganization could, under the appropriate circumstances, accomplish this goal. Another example is filing for bankruptcy protection in order to prevent a judgment creditor from seizing or garnishing bank accounts. An association with a judgment or upcoming trial could turn to a reorganization as a way to automatically stay the lawsuit/collection of the judgment and permit a realistic settlement. Finally, associations finding themselves threatened with the shut-off of service by utilities or other providers can, under certain circumstances, resort to reorganizations to temporarily prevent this drastic action.

WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR AN ASSOCIATION TO REORGANIZE? Proper authority from the Board and appropriate attorney fees and costs. In addition, an association should file a reorganization with a clear understanding of its exit strategy (i.e., a plan of reorganization).

COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH A REORGANIZATION: Reorganizations are not inexpensive and simple matters – filing fees to the bankruptcy court alone exceed $1,000. The debtors also need to pay quarterly fees to the United States Trustee while the reorganization is pending. Any debtor (association or otherwise) needs to contact competent counsel in time to prepare budgets and plan accordingly. It can and is done – even in dire situations where utility services are about to be interrupted. Counsel can advise how to properly prepare the necessary documents, authority and budget to reorganize under the Code.

WHAT HAPPENS TO ASSOCIATION RESIDENTS WHEN A COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION REORGANIZES? Ideally, nothing directly. If the association files with appropriate board authority and a reasonable game plan, the association should be able to function and provide the necessary services to the association property and residents.

Continue Reading...

Major Florida Condo & HOA Bill Includes Right to Prohibit Use of Common Elements

HB 115 Includes Major Changes for Condominium and Homeowners Associations; Disciplinary Actions Against Managers for Misconduct or Negligence; Provides for Suspension of Use and Voting Rights in Condominiums; Authorizes Filing Liens for Fines, Etc.

 Representatives Ambler and Robaina filed HB 115,  this week.  HB 115 is a bill devoted to community association issues.  The bill contains numerous provisions designed to improve community associations' collection efforts as well as protections for homeowners by mandating specific notice of the intent to take certain actions and requiring the ombudsman to create additional educational materials.  The bill also addresses distressed condominium and bulk purchaser/subsequent developer issues. 

The full text of the bill is 106 pages long.

Some of the highlights include:

  • Procedures to authorize a loan or line of credit;
  • 24 hours notice before entering a unit for any purpose (other than an emergency);
  • The ability to demand rent paid by a tenant directly, without Court action;
  • The ability to evict a tenant if the tenant fails to pay rent;
  • The ability to prohibit owners from using common elements if they are more than 90 days delinquent in paying assessments;
  • The ability to suspend members' voting rights;
  • A "Florida Condominium Handbook";
  • Prohibiting fees in HOAs in connection with sale, lease or other transfer of a parcel;
  • Removing the prohibition against filing a Lien for fines over $1,000 for HOAs; and
  • Substantially revised dispute resolution procedures for HOAs.

 The Community Association Leadership Lobby ("CALL") and other organizations are likely to publish more detailed information about the bill and its potential impact on community association operations.  Please refer back to this site for further information pertaining to specific portions of the bill.

 

Canceling Cable Contracts May Not Be So Easy After All

Appellate Court Confirms Right of Condominium Association Members to Cancel Cable Television Contracts Entered Into By Developer Prior to Turnover.  Nontheless, exercising this right provided by Florida Law may not be so easy.

By now you probably heard that a Florida appellate court ruled a condominium association may use Section 718.302, Florida Statutes, to terminate a cable agreement entered into by the developer prior to turnover. Section 718.302, Florida Statutes, states that any contract made by a developer prior to turnover that provides for the “operation, maintenance, or management of a condominium association or property serving the unit owners of a condominium…may be cancelled by unit owners other than the developer…by concurrence of the owners of not less than 75% of the voting interests other than the voting interests owned by the developer..."

In Comcast of Florida, L.P. vs. L'Ambiance Beach Condominium Association, Inc., No. 4D08-2326 ,Comcast argued that cable agreements are not for the "operation, maintenance, or management" of the association or property serving the unit owners and thus, Section 718.302 did not apply. Comcast also argued that Section 718.115(d), Florida Statutes, which is specific to television programming, was the only statute that should apply to canceling cable agreements.

The court rejected Comcast's arguments. The court concluded that because the agreement provided for cable television service for all unit owners, the cost was part of the monthly maintenance fee, and the service provider was required to service and maintain the cable television, the agreement was one for the “operation, maintenance, or management” of the cable television services. Therefore, the agreement could be cancelled by a vote of 75% of the voting interests.

This case is beneficial to condominium residents in several respects, primarily as a result of the issues concerning ownership, use and control of the wiring throughout the property.  

Nonetheless, an association in the Naples area understands how difficult it is to actually effectuate termination.  The Association must pay Comcast $10,000 a month on behalf of 330 units, when many of them are not occupied and the owners are not paying assessments or maintenance fees.  While Comcast's spokesperson said the company is reviewing the appellate decision, it did not necessarily agree that the decision applied statewide the Collier Citizen reported.

Another warning - look at the contract to see whether Florida Law even applies.  Recently I have seen several contracts for television programming service (whether cable or satellite) and contracts for office equipment such as copiers and computers that contain what is known as a "choice of law" provision.  This provision states that the contract is governed by the law of a particular jurisdiction (other than Florida) and any dispute regarding the contract (intending to include disputes over cancelation) must be brought and litigated in that jurisdiction.

Please let us know if you have questions regarding your contracts and do NOT sign any contract that is governed by law other than Florida Law.

 

 

Can the Association Cut Off Cable or Shut Down Water Service?

Lisa A. Magill, Florida Lawyer, Real Estate AttorneyAssociations struggling with bad debt pushing the envelope trying to make up for deficits.

Earlier this week news reports showed homeowners living without water service to their homes.  The association shut down the water service because the homeowner didn't pay maintenance fees for several months. The homeowners' attorney claims that the Board acted illegally.  The Board, on the other hand, wants to put as much pressure on the owners to pay maintenance fees. 

In an earlier post I described actions prohibited by Florida's consumer protection laws.  I received quite a few comments indicating that associations regularly publish debtor lists to embarrass or harass the delinquent owners and associations have shut down cable or other television programming, restricted access to recreational facilities, deactivated entry devices for security gates to the property (forcing owners to use the guest gate) and stopped other services.  But can an association in Florida shut down services when an owner doesn't pay?

Condominium Associations cannot prohibit owners' access or use of the common elements.  Section 718.106, Florida Statutes guarantees every owner's right to use the common elements, which would include the recreational facilities (if part of the condominium), regardless whether they have fulfilled their responsibility to pay maintenance fees.  However, in response to cries from community leaders throughout the State, legislation was proposed during the 2009 session to permit condominium boards to suspend certain rights of use as a result of non-payment.  We are likely to see proposals in the 2010 session addressing this issue as well.  Community leaders and managers can stay up-to-date with respect to legislative activities by participating in the Community Association Leadership Lobby (CALL), which is a Statewide not-for-profit advocacy effort that not only monitors, but participates in drafting legislation designed to improve association operations.

Homeowners' Associations do have support to suspend use of "common areas and facilities" if the governing documents are written in a certain way.  Section 720.305, Florida Statutes contains the following provisions:

If the governing documents so provide, an association may suspend, for a reasonable period of time, the rights of a member or a member's tenants, guests, or invitees, or both, to use common areas and facilities and may levy reasonable fines, not to exceed $100 per violation, against any member or any tenant, guest, or invitee. A fine may be levied on the basis of each day of a continuing violation, with a single notice and opportunity for hearing, except that no such fine shall exceed $1,000 in the aggregate unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine shall not become a lien against a parcel. In any action to recover a fine, the prevailing party is entitled to collect its reasonable attorney's fees and costs from the nonprevailing party as determined by the court.

A fine or suspension may not be imposed without notice of at least 14 days to the person sought to be fined or suspended and an opportunity for a hearing before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board who are not officers, directors, or employees of the association, or the spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister of an officer, director, or employee. If the committee, by majority vote, does not approve a proposed fine or suspension, it may not be imposed.

The requirements of this subsection do not apply to the imposition of suspensions or fines upon any member because of the failure of the member to pay assessments or other charges when due if such action is authorized by the governing documents.

The term 'common areas' is defined in the Homeowners' Association Act, but the term 'common facilities' is not described.  The governing documents may define the term 'common area' more specifically and may even include (generally by an amendment) a definition of 'common facilities', but is the cable service either?  What about water service?  Are the pipes carrying the water or the wires carrying the television programming owned and/or maintained by the Association?  What if the television programming is through a satellite system and you don't even have any wires in the common areas?

These questions have yet to be answered by an appellate court.  An adverse ruling with respect to either of these types of actions exposes community associations (and their leaders under certain circumstances) to liability, so it is very important to consult with counsel before trying to shut off any type of service.

It is also important to note that the statutes specifically prohibits restricting access to the individual home.  It says:

Suspension of common-area-use rights shall not impair the right of an owner or tenant of a parcel to have vehicular and pedestrian ingress to and egress from the parcel, including, but not limited to, the right to park.
 

Community leaders can and should be proactive when it comes to collecting assessments and maintenance fees, but they need to be concerned with liability issues.  Therefore, I encourage you to consult with counsel to determine what, if any, changes to the governing documents will improve your position, as no association can operate without its primary (and generally only) source of revenue.